If you’re a classic car enthusiast, then you know that the Camaro is one of the most iconic muscle cars in history. One of the distinguishing features of the Camaro is its tail lights. The 1967 and 1968 Camaro tail lights are often compared, with enthusiasts debating which one is better. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the 67 vs 68 Camaro Tail Lights and help you decide which one is right for you.
Contents
Evolution of Camaro Tail Lights
The Camaro tail lights have undergone several changes over the years, starting from the first-generation models. The first Camaro, launched in 1967, featured rectangular tail lights with rounded edges. These tail lights had a unique design that set the Camaro apart from other muscle cars of the era.
In 1968, the Camaro underwent a facelift, and the tail lights were redesigned. The new design featured a horizontal chrome strip that ran across the tail light, giving it a more aggressive look. The 1968 Camaro also had a more prominent rear bumper, which added to the car’s overall appeal.
67 vs 68 Camaro Tail Lights
We have compared some key features and points. These are –
Design and Appearance
When it comes to design and appearance, the 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights have distinct differences. The 1967 Camaro has a more rounded shape with a single reverse light in the center. The 1968 Camaro, on the other hand, has a square shape with two reverse lights on each side.
The 67 Camaro tail lights are more understated and have a classic look, while the 68 Camaro tail lights have a more modern appearance. Some people prefer the classic look of the 67 tail lights, while others prefer the more modern design of the 68 tail lights.
Lighting Performance
When it comes to lighting performance, both the 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights are fairly similar. They both use incandescent bulbs and have similar levels of brightness. However, the 68 Camaro tail lights do have an advantage when it comes to visibility. The dual reverse lights on each side make it easier for other drivers to see when you’re backing up.
Maintenance and Repair
Maintenance and repair is an important consideration when it comes to classic cars. Both the 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights are fairly easy to maintain and repair. Replacement parts for both models are readily available, and the wiring is simple and straightforward.
Rarity and Collectibility
Rarity and collectibility are important factors for classic car enthusiasts. The 1967 Camaro was the first year of production, making it a bit more rare and collectible than the 1968 model. Additionally, the 67 Camaro has a more classic look that many collectors prefer.
However, the 1968 Camaro was a one-year-only design, which makes it more rare and collectible in its own right. The 68 Camaro also has a more modern design that appeals to a different set of collectors.
Price
Finally, price is always a consideration when it comes to classic cars. Both the 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights are relatively affordable, with replacement parts and entire units readily available. However, due to the rarity and collectability factors, the 67 Camaro tail lights may be slightly more expensive than the 68 Camaro tail lights.
Comparisons Table of 67 vs 68 Camaro tail lights:
To help you make an informed decision about which Camaro tail lights are right for you, let’s compare the 67 vs 68 Camaro tail lights in a side-by-side comparison table:
| Category | 67 Camaro Tail Lights | 68 Camaro Tail Lights |
| Design and Appearance | Rounded shape with single reverse light | Square shape with dual reverse lights |
| Lighting Performance | Similar | Dual reverse lights make it easier for others to see when backing up |
| Maintenance and Repair | Easy to maintain and repair | Easy to maintain and repair |
| Rarity and Collectibility | First year of production, more classic look | One-year-only design, more modern look |
| Price | Slightly more expensive due to rarity and collectibility factors | Slightly less expensive due to lower rarity factor |
Comparing the Pros and Cons of 67 and 68 Camaro Tail Lights
Here is a table comparing the pros and cons of 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights:
| Tail Light Design | Reverse Light Location | Rear Bumper | Pros | Cons |
| 67 Camaro | Below the bumper | Less prominent | Classic design, unique shape | May appear dated to some |
| 68 Camaro | Integrated into tail lights | More prominent | Modern, aggressive design | May not be as unique as 67 Camaro |
Which Camaro Tail Lights Are Better?
There is no clear answer to this question, as it ultimately comes down to personal preference. Some people prefer the sleek and classic look of the 67 Camaro tail lights, while others prefer the more aggressive and modern look of the 68 Camaro tail lights.
Conclusion:
The 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights both have their own unique features and design elements. The 67 Camaro tail lights have a more classic look and are slightly more expensive due to their rarity and collectibility. The 68 Camaro tail lights have a more modern appearance and better visibility with their dual reverse lights. Ultimately, the choice between the two models comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of the driver.
Whether you’re restoring a classic Camaro or simply upgrading your tail lights, it’s important to consider all of the factors that come into play. With their distinct differences in design, lighting performance, maintenance, rarity, and price, the 67 and 68 Camaro tail lights offer unique options for classic car enthusiasts.
So, 67 vs 68 Camaro tail lights, which one is better? That’s up to you to decide based on your personal taste and preferences. But one thing is for sure: no matter which model you choose, the Camaro will continue to be an iconic and beloved muscle car for years to come.